Alcatraz (Probably) Isn’t Coming Back — and We Shouldn’t Want It To

Alcatraz (Probably) Isn’t Coming Back — and We Shouldn’t Want It To

Every once in a while, a headline floats across the internet promising that Alcatraz might reopen. Most recently, it’s come from Trump, who proposed turning the shuttered island prison back into a functioning one. The idea is as theatrical as it is empty. It’s exactly the kind of distraction our carceral system thrives on.

Alcatraz has always lived more in the American imagination than in our reality. It operated for just 29 years, and closed in 1963. it’s been a tourist destination ever since. It’s famous not because it worked, but because it didn’t.

To take Alcatraz back and turn it into an operational penitentiary, using the building that is there now, would make as much sense as taking Fort Sumter, putting it back together and arming it with missile loading cannons. – Alcatraz historian John Martini 

Reopening Alcatraz wouldn’t solve a single issue plaguing our criminal legal system. It wouldn’t fix the lack of mental health care. It wouldn’t provide jobs or housing or education. It wouldn’t decarcerate. It would just feed the myth that harsher punishment equals safety.


Want to see more posts like this? Subscribe


Meanwhile, roughly two million people are already incarcerated in this country, scattered across more than 1,000 prisons, jails, and detention centers – many crumbling, overcrowded, or operating in violation of human rights.

If politicians want to get serious about incarceration, they don’t need to dust off the keys to a rock in the San Francisco Bay. They need to fund public defenders. They need to end cash bail. They need to stop criminalizing poverty, and addiction, and mental illness.

They need to listen to the people inside.

And while we’re talking about reclaiming Alcatraz, here’s some interesting history about who already did.

In 1969, a group of Native American activists from Indians of All Tribes occupied Alcatraz Island. They lived there for 19 months in a peaceful protest, reclaiming the land in response to centuries of displacement, broken treaties, and erasure.

They didn’t come to punish. They came to remind this country of its promises, and its failures.

We don’t need more cages. We need more connection.
More compassion. More change.


📬 Want to do something that actually helps?

Write a letter. Challenge the myth that punishment is the answer.
Invest in people, not myths.

Donate stamps.
Give – Fuel the mission
✍️ Take the Quiz – How much do you know about U.S. prisons?

Fact Check Friday: If You Can’t Do the Time, Don’t Do the Crime

Fact Check Friday: If You Can’t Do the Time, Don’t Do the Crime

“If You Can’t Do the Time, Don’t Do the Crime”

You’ve heard it. Maybe you’ve even said it.

But that smug little rhyme only works if you believe the punishment always fits the crime — and that everyone inside actually did it.

🔎 FACT CHECK:

Neither is true.

🚨 What We’re Seeing:

Heavily armed, masked agents:

  • No identification
  • No warrants
  • No probable cause
  • No Miranda rights
  • Shooting rubber bullets and chemical agents at peaceful protesters and journalists
In America:
  • You have a RIGHT to protest.
  • You have a RIGHT to know who is detaining you.
  • Agents need a WARRANT or PROBABLE CAUSE.
  • Masked paramilitary forces dragging people into unmarked vehicles is ILLEGAL.

What we’re witnessing in cities like Los Angeles and Nashville isn’t “immigration enforcement” - it’s extrajudicial abduction. It's kidnapping and human trafficking.


🧨 Being undocumented is not a crime.

It’s a civil offense, not grounds for violent raids.

Yet workers - cooks, janitors, dishwashers, farmhands - are being hunted like fugitives, while real threats walk free in positions of power.


💬 Quote of the Week:

I’ve never in my life feared an immigrant or a trans person. I’ve feared the men in my church, the white men in office, and now the armed men hiding behind masks, badges, weapons, and lies.

[...] and i hope they remember the Nuremberg trials, because this fever is going to break, and you will be held accountable for your crimes.
Monte Mader


🗣️ We Need to Say It Plain:

This is not about safety.
It’s not about law and order.
It’s about control and power, and using fear, and cruelty to get it.
That's called fascism.


📣 Your Rights (Even Now):

✅ You do not have to open the door to ICE without a signed judicial warrant.
✅ You have the right to remain silent.
✅ You have the right to record in public.
✅ You have the right to protest.
✅ You have the right to legal representation.

Know them. Use them. Defend them.


❤️ Call to Action

🧵 Share this post.
📬 CALL AND WRITE your lawmakers.
🎤 Speak out. 
💰 Support local immigrant aid organizations.

Because when they come for them, they’re coming for us all.

Want to see more posts like this? Subscribe.

Challenge the Myth
Share this post with someone who needs to see it

✍️ Take the Quiz
Think you know how the justice system works?

🗣️ Share Your Story
Have you or a loved one faced an unfair sentence or wrongful charge?

💌 Donate Stamps
We fight these myths every day — and we do it by mail.

❤️ Support the Work
Your donation fuels education, advocacy, and dignity.

I Don’t Have a Spirit of Fear — I Have a Spirit of Courage and Might

I Don’t Have a Spirit of Fear — I Have a Spirit of Courage and Might

This series shares reflections directly from people in prison — what gives them hope, what causes harm, and what they believe needs to change.

ADD YOUR TWO CENTS

  • Snail mail:

Adopt an Inmate
*Good Bad Change*
PO Box 1543
Veneta, OR 97487

  • E-mail: submit@adoptaninmate.org


Want more posts like this? Subscribe to our blog


Responses by:

Matt in NY

Role: Formerly Incarcerated
💬 The Good: What’s one positive thing you’ve seen or experienced in prison?
I would say one of the positive things I seen in prison is I had plenty of time to read! And can say this has directly impacted the changes I made!
💬 The Bad: What’s one negative thing you’ve seen or experienced in prison?

The continued excessive abuse, and no way to actually address the things that are occurring inside – like the grievance system is completely ineffective!

💬 The Change: If you could change one thing about prison, what would it be?
For it to be more restorative based than punitive!

Our friend Matt, who shared his answers above, recorded this video on February 25, 2025, during the NY DOCCS strike (now concluded). Matt speaks candidly about the injustices he witnessed and experienced while inside — and the deep need for accountability and change.

Forward This Email – Someone needs to see this
📢 Add Your Voice – Submit your responses to our Good, Bad, Change poll
✍️ Take the Quiz – How much do you know about U.S. prisons?
💌 Donate Stamps – Help us send more love inside
❤️ Give – Support dignity, connection, and second chances.

Policy vs. People: Prison Gerrymandering

Policy vs. People: Prison Gerrymandering

“You Can’t Vote, But You Still Count… Somewhere Else.”

When someone is incarcerated, they lose the right to vote. But during the census, they’re still counted, not where they’re from, but where they’re locked up.

And that simple detail is a political power grab.

Most incarcerated people come from urban areas. But prisons are usually built in rural districts, and that’s where they’re counted. Their bodies inflate the political power of the district that holds them, not the one that raised them.

It’s called prison gerrymandering, and it lets rural areas gain representation and resources by warehousing people from somewhere else.

 

The result?

  • A person in prison can’t vote.
  • Their hometown loses representation.
  • The rural district gets political power, without earning it.

That’s not democracy.
That’s incarceration without participation.

What can be done?

A few states have ended the practice by counting people where they actually live, their home address, not their cell. But most haven’t. Because power is hard to give up, even when it was never yours to begin with.

📣 Share This Post
Prison gerrymandering thrives on silence. Let people know what’s really going on.

✍️ Take the Quiz
How much do you really know about mass incarceration?

🗣️ Tell Your Story
Has redistricting or incarceration affected your voice or your vote?

❤️ Give
Support our work to expose injustice and fight for fair representation.

Civics 101: What the Hell Is Qualified Immunity?

Civics 101: What the Hell Is Qualified Immunity?

Let’s break it down.

Qualified immunity is a legal doctrine that protects government officials, including police officers and prison staff, from being sued for violating someone’s constitutional rights, unless the violation was “clearly established.”

Sounds simple. It’s not.

Here’s how it works in practice:
  • A government official can violate your rights.
  • But you can’t sue them unless there’s a nearly identical case where someone else already sued, and a court ruled it was unconstitutional.
  • If no one has challenged that exact scenario before? They walk free.
Real example:

A corrections officer pepper sprays a prisoner in a locked cell for no reason.
The court says: “Sure, that’s wrong. But we’ve never ruled on this exact type of pepper spray incident before.”
Case dismissed. Qualified immunity.

Yes, it’s that absurd.

Why it matters:

Qualified immunity creates a system where officers are rarely held accountable, even for obvious abuse.
It protects the system instead of the people harmed by it.

Landmark Cases

Harlow v. Fitzgerald (1982)

This is where qualified immunity really took off.
The Supreme Court ruled that government officials are protected unless they violate “clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.”

Translation: If the law wasn’t already obvious, they’re off the hook.

Hope v. Pelzer (2002)

One of the rare victories against qualified immunity.
A man in an Alabama prison was handcuffed to a hitching post in the sun for seven hours, without water or bathroom breaks.
The Supreme Court said: yeah, you didn’t need a nearly identical case to know this was unconstitutional.

It was cruel. Period.

Taylor v. Riojas (2020)

A man was locked in a feces-smeared prison cell for days, then moved to a freezing cell with a clogged drain.
The Fifth Circuit dismissed his case under qualified immunity.
The Supreme Court overturned it.

“No reasonable officer could think this was okay,” they said.

Even so — this was a narrow exception. Most cases still get tossed.

What Can Disqualify Officers from Qualified Immunity?

Qualified immunity is a shield, not a license to kill, but the bar to disqualify someone is ridiculously high. A few things that might break the shield:

  • A previous case with nearly the same facts ruled unconstitutional
  • Excessive force so egregious that “no reasonable officer” would think it’s legal
  • Clear policy violations or orders from supervisors that contradict law
  • In rare cases, judicial notice that certain conduct is obviously unconstitutional (like in Hope or Taylor)
How do we fix it?
  • Congress can limit or abolish it.
  • State legislatures can pass laws allowing lawsuits in state court.
  • Courts can stop granting immunity like it’s candy.

But none of that will happen if we don’t understand how the system protects itself, or who it’s protecting from accountability.

Qualified immunity wasn’t meant to protect bad actors, but that’s exactly what it does.
If we want a justice system that values human dignity, we can’t let loopholes excuse abuse.

💡 Want more bite-sized civics lessons? Subscribe to the blog.
💌 Donate Stamps – Help us send more love inside
Give Fuel the mission

Spot the Slip-Up

Spot the Slip-Up

We like to keep things interesting around here, and what better way than sprinkling in a few mistakes? 😇

If you’ve been reading our Sunday Reads, you may have noticed a little hiccup. Or two.

Yep, we slipped up two weeks back-to-back: Did you catch it? 👀

Need a hint?

  • The first one rhymes with schmissing schlink (classic).
  • The next … let’s just say autocorrect called in sick.

Was it unintentional? Or was it a test?

Either way, we’re calling it, This is now a game. 🐝

From now on, whenever something goes wrong (which, let’s be real… is often), the first reader to reply or comment gets …. absolutely nothing!

But wait! That’s not all you won’t get! There’s more:

       🥇 Bragging rights (redeemable nowhere)

       ⭐ A virtual gold star (non-transferable, but eternally shiny)

       📣 A shoutout in next week’s Sunday Reads (fame pending)

Bee the First. Buzz the Loudest. Spot the Slip-Up.

Because perfection is overrated, but participation? That’s the bee’s knees.


✍️ Take the Quiz – How much do you know about U.S. prisons?
🤲 Get InvolvedHelp behind the scenes
💌 Donate StampsHelp us send more love inside
Give Fuel the mission

Fact Check Friday: If You Can’t Do the Time, Don’t Do the Crime

Fact Check Friday: Prison Is The Only Form of Accountability

Claim:
Prison Is the Only Form of Accountability

🔍 Fact check:
Nope. That’s carceral thinking.

💡 TRUTH:

Accountability can exist outside of punishment. In fact, many of the most meaningful forms of accountability — repairing harm, making amends, transformation — can’t happen inside a cage.


Want more posts like this? Subscribe to our blog


Let’s break it down:

Prison often severs relationships, destroys housing and employment, and re-traumatizes — making accountability less likely, not more.

Restorative justice and transformative justice offer real alternatives, especially in communities most harmed by both crime and incarceration.

✅ Survivors of violence often say what they want most is for the harm to stop and not happen to someone else — not punishment.

Additional Context

We’ve been sold a lie that punishment equals justice. But punishment without accountability isn’t healing — it’s just pain. Real justice means addressing the root causes and centering the people harmed.

Want to make a difference in 30 seconds?
👉 Donate stamps or send a few with a click »

🔁 Take the Quiz – How much do you know about U.S. prisons?
📣 Add Your Voice – Submit your responses to our Good, Bad, Change poll
👀 Forward This Email – Someone needs to see this
🤲 Get Involved – Help behind the scenes
🤝 Connect With Someone Inside – 🐝 a lifeline
❤️ Give – Help us build a world where no one is forgotten

Bee Speak Part II 🐝 Your Jar Is Open

Bee Speak Part II 🐝 Your Jar Is Open

Welcome to Bee Sides
short reflections on justice, hope, and the human spirit

This series is a corner of our blog where I gather books, stories, and unexpected moments that linger long after the first glance.

Most will tie back to incarceration, justice, and the quiet fight for dignity. But sometimes? It’ll simply be whatever refuses to let go. The echoes that stay with me. Because that’s what Bee Sides are for.

Let me know what you’re reading, watching, or wondering about. Maybe it’ll make the next issue.


 

This one’s about the secret life of names, how they shape us, and how they land.

Part I was the story of how bees became our symbol of shared labor, mutual care, and volunteer culture. Part II is the more personal side.

The bees didn’t just show up in our mission.
They showed up in old traditions, strange timing, and tiny messengers with wings.

‘Lily Melissa Owens, your jar is open.’

The quote is a whisper of a moment in the book The Secret Life of Bees, and unexplained beyond the metaphor of an open door and the chance to walk through it. But I knew what else it meant.

Bees and honey run through the history of people I love.

When my son was just starting to talk, he couldn’t pronounce his sister’s name, Kayla, so he called her what he heard the grownups call her: Honey.

He’d run to her at full speed after she got out of school, weaving through all the other kids, squealing with joy, “Honey!” The other moms were delighted.

There was a little girl in the neighborhood named Michaela. 

He called her Ma-Honey.

And then there’s Van Morrison. You see this one coming, right? My daughter and I love Tupelo Honey, which is layered into our story. ‘Just like honey, baby, from the bee.’

And my mom? My mom’s initials are B.B. Her husband, who adored her, simply called her B.

When I sold my home in 2012 to start a new life, my daughter gave me a signed copy of The Secret Life of Bees for Christmas. It was a time when I needed to believe that the jar was opening for me, too. Six months later came the catalyst for everything that would eventually become Adopt an Inmate. 

It’s funny how life keeps echoing itself. Sometimes we’re not choosing the symbols, we’re just listening. It can even be a color, a taste, a scent. Or a name.

I met my oldest and dearest friend on the first day of sixth grade in the fall of 1975. She has a gift that has always fascinated me. She feels names.

We live in different states now, but I know the full names of her friends because that’s how she refers to them. It’s an act of respect. She’s the only one who knows the full parade of names I’ve worn over the years. In order. Legal, chosen, abandoned. The outward signs of all my attempts to choose who I was, or to borrow who I thought I was supposed to be.

Her name stayed the same while I spun and flitted around. She never judged. Just watched me circle, waiting for me to land.

Once, I saw her guess a stranger’s name.

She was visiting me, and I took her to the charming downtown in my little city. We had just left a bookstore and crossed the street so I could take her to a groovy local spot. A cigar bar with jazz music, pool tables, and spirits. At the counter we ordered ruby port, and (I swear I am not making this up) Havana Honey cigars.

She mentioned to the owner that she’d just picked up a poetry book by Bukowski. He shrugged and said he wasn’t much for poetry.

Well that didn’t sit well with her. She always knew who she was, a writer, musician, an actor. Art, in all its forms, is sacred to her. She couldn’t let it stand that someone would intentionally shut out that kind of beauty from their life.

“If I can guess your name,” she said, “you’ll read one poem from this book.”

And because she always makes room for others, she invited me in:
“You go first,” she said. “Take a guess.”

I don’t remember what I said.
It wasn’t his name.

Then it was her turn. She went quiet. Studied him.
His energy. His posture. His face as he looked back at her.

After maybe fifteen seconds, she said:

“David.”

She said it with such confidence, I knew she was right. He turned to his staff and demanded to know who told her.

But no one had.
It wasn’t some parlor trick. It was reverence.

Years after that, we met in New York, and visited the 9/11 memorial. The one with all the names. She had to sit down. “It’s the names,” she said through tears, feeling the weight of them.

If you’re wondering what her name is, it’s Sarah.

Her name means princess, but she’s not the tiara-wearing type.
She’s royalty of a different kind.

The kind that can command the stage, summon a name, and still remember your dog’s birthday.

One of my former last names began with a B, which is why, years ago, I started using “Bee” as my last name online. It was a way to keep myself both hidden and seen.

Just a few months ago, after some significant personal turmoil, I stopped circling, and landed, legally changing my name for the last time. To what it always real-ly was. Melissa Bee.

One last breadcrumb:
It’s never explained.

Not in the book. Not in the movie.
But I’ll tell you something Sue Monk Kidd never does:

Lily’s middle name, Melissa, means “honeybee.”

So yes, this little “bee thing” is personal. 

Messages from the universe are a lot like dreams.
They don’t need to make sense to anyone but you.
Someone else may come away with something completely different.
That’s the beauty of it.

So now I’m curious …
Has a book, a name, or a line ever cracked something open for you?
Have you ever stumbled across a message that felt… meant?

🗣️ Tell me your story. What was your jar is open moment?

🔗 Missed Part I? Read Bee Speak: The History of Communal Labor
🐝 Get Involved – Help behind the scenes
✍️ Take the Quiz – How much do you know about U.S. prisons?
Give – Fuel the mission

What’s With All The Bee Speak? 🐝 Part I

What’s With All The Bee Speak? 🐝 Part I

If you’ve followed us for even a little while, you’ve probably noticed: we talk a lot about bees.

From our Bee Team and Bee Fest, to Bee Sides, and taglines like 🐝 a lifeline,’ we wear our love for bee metaphors proudly. But it’s not just cute branding.

Bee is derived from the Old English bēn meaning “a prayer, a favor.” It was first coined in the late 18th century, referring to “a meeting of neighbors to unite their labors for the benefit of one of their number,” much like little worker bees in a hive.

The earliest known example in print is a spinning bee, in 1769. Other early occurrences are husking bee (1816), apple bee (1827), and logging bee (1836).


Want to see more posts like this? Subscribe.


Farmers, artisans, and neighbors came together for barn raisings, husking bees, and quilting parties, pooling their skills and resources to accomplish tasks that were beyond the capacity of a single household

These gatherings were a testament to the power of community bonding and the necessity of shared labor in a time of limited resources and geographic mobility. They fostered a unique labor dynamic, where individuals contributed their skills and talents to create something beautiful together, strengthening community bonds and promoting social evolution.

At Adopt an Inmate, we honor and continue this tradition. We foster communal labor and mutual support, providing opportunities to learn, share skills, uplift one another, and witness the transformative power of collective effort.

In our world, a “bee” might look like:

  • A mail-processing day with volunteers around the table
  • A late-night brainstorm to improve our systems
  • A cross-state collaboration to match adopters and PIPs
  • A family working together in memory of a loved one

And yes—sometimes it’s just dancing like goofballs while stuffing envelopes. 🐝💃

Stay tuned for Part II of this story, in the next post.

(Shout out to Sewing Trip for the history lesson.)

*See a video here, of a group of female worker Bees 🐝 rushed to the aid of a single bee to free her after being trapped in a spiderweb.


✍️ Take the Quiz – How much do you know about U.S. prisons?
🤲 Get InvolvedHelp behind the scenes
💌 Donate StampsHelp us send more love inside
Give Fuel the mission

Civics 101: What the Hell Is Qualified Immunity?

Civics 101: How a Bill Becomes a Law (and Why It’s So Damn Slow)

This is part of our Civics 101 series — breaking down the structures behind the headlines.

[See all Civics 101 posts here.]


Ever wondered why it takes Congress forever to do anything?

Here’s the quick (and maddening) journey of how a bill becomes a law, with a few real-world barriers tossed in.

Step 1: Someone Has an Idea

It could be a lawmaker, a community advocate, or someone who knows how broken the system is (like you). The idea gets drafted into a bill.

📌 Bills can start in either the House or the Senate — unless they deal with taxes. Those must start in the House.

Step 2: Committee Purgatory

The bill is sent to a committee of lawmakers who specialize in that issue.
Most bills die here. Why?
Because committees have gatekeepers, and lobbyists with deep pockets often shape what gets a hearing.

Step 3: Debate + Vote

If the committee approves it, the bill gets debated and amended on the House or Senate floor.
If it passes one chamber, it goes to the other (House → Senate or Senate → House).
More debate. More amendments. More political drama.

Step 4: Conference Committee

If the House and Senate pass different versions, a conference committee merges them into one bill. Then both chambers vote again.

Step 5: Presidential Signature

If it passes both chambers, it lands on the president’s desk.
The president can:

  • Sign it = 💡 It becomes law
  • Veto it = 💥 Back to Congress, where they can override the veto with a 2/3 vote.

Step 6: The Law… Still Isn’t Law Yet?

Once signed, agencies create regulations to enforce it. And courts can still strike it down.

⚖️ And Here’s the Kick in the Teeth

Most criminal justice reform bills aren’t retroactive.
To make them more “politically acceptable,” lawmakers write them so they only apply to future cases.
That means:

  • People serving decades-long sentences don’t benefit.
  • Those most harmed by outdated laws are left behind.
  • It takes another legislative battle — often years later — to maybe make the reform retroactive.

📌 People watch others walk free for what they’re still serving time for. That’s not just oversight — that’s design.


Why It Matters

People often ask: “Why doesn’t Congress just pass a law?”
Because the system was built to be slow. But sometimes, that slowness protects us. Other times, it’s a barrier that leaves people suffering while lawmakers stall.


🗣️ Have a civic question you want us to cover? Want to break down a specific law or policy? [Share your idea with us here.]

💬 Leave a comment (scroll down) or forward this post to someone who says “just change the law!”


Forward This Post – Someone in your life needs to understand this.

🗣️ Share Your Story – How has incarceration or policy shaped your life?

💌 Donate Stamps – Help us send dignity, hope, and human connection. .

✍️ Take the Quiz – Think you know how U.S. prisons work?

🧠 Subscribe – Get new blog posts and action tools in your inbox.

CHAT