A Roundabout Happy Mother’s Day
A random act of kindness from a prisoner. #justlikeus
A random act of kindness from a prisoner. #justlikeus
The deadliest incident of violence in a United States prison in a quarter century took place at the Lee Correctional Institution in South Carolina on April 15, 2018.
According to multiple reports, including SCDC Director Bryan Stirlingâs own, prison guards and EMTs made no attempt to break things up or lend medical aid from moment the fight commenced until hours after it was over, while imprisoned people were beaten and stabbed to death. Seven people were killed and dozens were injured, with at least twenty two requiring hospitalization.
On April 22, I interviewed three individuals from various prisons inside the South Carolina Department of Corrections. One of the prisoners identified himself as a member of Jailhouse Lawyers Speak, a group of imprisoned human rights advocates that has made national calls to action for a prisoner-led strike in response to the conditions they feel are truly responsible for the violence and hopelessness within prisons across the United States. The strike is expected to begin on August 21st, 2018.
Throughout our conversation, these three individuals, who are identified only as D, S, and E to protect their identities and prevent retaliation by prison officials, highlight the impacts of policies pushed by President Bill Clintonâs administration and implemented by states across the country. They also point to the dehumanization of prisoners and challenge our conception of âgangs,â which does not take into account the ways in which incarcerated people are forced to create their own collective means for safety, survival, and camaraderie in a situation where hope is the scarcest commodity.
They also urge the public to reconsider the nature and source of violence within prisons and the absence of human dignity and a rehabilitative environment within our nationâs prisons. They present actionable solutions to mitigate some of the harm caused by prisons on our ultimate path toward shedding carceral responses to legitimate societal needs.
As I write this introduction on May 2nd, 2018, South Carolina prisoners have confirmed that all Level 2 and 3 facilities have remained on a statewide lockdown since April 15th. This means people imprisoned in facilities have been denied any freedom of movement, regular access to showers, recreation, or meals outside the confines of their cells.
We grant permission for individuals and news organizations to republish this interview in its entirety for their audiences. It is imperative that we deepen conversations around the causes of violence in prisons and the real impacts of incarceration on all people, inside and outside the walls.
Editorâs note: this transcript has been lightly edited for clarity.
Jared: Firstly, for context for folks who are reading this, there have been a lot of things that have gone down in South Carolina prisons over the last year or two, if you guys could lay down some of that context for people, because I think a lot of people donât understand some of the things that prisoners throughout South Carolina have been dealing with and how those conditions might contribute to prisoners really feeling a sense of hopelessness?
D: Iâm going to take you back a little step here, to 1996 at least. Iâll cover it a little bit, and Iâll be as brief as possible. Prior to Bill Clintonâs Prison Litigation Reform Act, anti-terrorism act, these acts that went into full effect in 1996, initiated what is known as the 85% or Truth In Sentencing 1 throughout most of the states inside this nation today. Itâs not just necessarily something that incubated inside the South Carolina, it was actually national. There was a domino effect, okay? But in 1996, specifically, the reason why Iâm pinpointing that is because at that particular point in the state of South Carolina, there was no such thing as a natural life sentence in the department of corrections. There was no such thing as a forever-type sentence, where individuals thought that they werenât going to be able to get out.
Even if you had a violent offense, or a labeled-violent offense, you still had something known as a work release date. You still would have some type of eligibility to go to work release, and that also meant the eligibility to go to work at some place on the street, or go home even on the weekends in the state of South Carolina. They had opportunity to make state pay. 2 during that particular time period. Even when you [were] at what was known as the max yard. These yards [were] clearly open, everybody could roam and move around free.
But when 1996 set in, and you had this mindset that started to kicked in, that was known, as Hillary Clinton called [it], as locking down these âsuper predators.â They called it also the War on Drugs, which I call the war on the black and brown community. All these things is playing into effect at that particular time period, and that created the environment inside.
We found fences starting to be wrapped into the prisons, we found prisoners that was labeled as violent offenders, was sent into these fences, and caged into buildings all day. We found that the food started deteriorating, we saw the clothes removed, and we saw the ways that [imprisoned people] could make money removed out of the system. There was no longer any type of state pay. Even though state pay was very minimal, it was still an opportunity to buy a bar of soap or a Honey Bun or something like that. We saw that visitation was being restricted.
It was just a host of things that started being incubated. And then the hopelessness set in. Because what happened then is we started having these life sentences coming through under 85 percent, where prisoners knew they were never going to see daylight again. We started having what we call âfootball numbers:â 80, 100, 150 years coming through 85 percent [time served, where prisoners knew they were] never going to see daylight again.
So this is where actually a lot of the problems started accumulating. And not only that, but actually education was removed by the prison system. Any type of Pell Grants, all that was gone. Education, technical colleges, everything was removed. So thatâs a little bit of a picture of what kind of started to shape the environment back here.
Jared: Thank you, so that changed obviously the overall conditions of how prisons across the country changed and sort of the hopelessness that set in. Can you talk to me a little bit though of some of the specific things that happened in South Carolina over the last couple of years?
D: And this is when the most sadistic mindsets start to set in. Prisoncrats⌠And Iâm going to [let] the brother answer that one.
S: So for one, as the brother was just telling you with the âfootball numbers,â prisoners got a lot of time to serve, but actually with nothing to do. When they took away all the privileges, they took away a lot of the programs. Stuff like that, it leads to just standing around with nothing to do, except to indulge in negative behavior, and reactionary behavior, and just all different forms of escapism–whatever they can do to pass the time.
They drug test you so they can take away your privileges. Why do they need drug testing inside the prisons? People are already in here doing time, itâs irrelevant. I can see if somebodyâs getting ready to go home for parole or something like that and youâre going to test them, but just to constantly test them, thatâs kind of like a waste of money. They always waste their funds on things they donât need to waste their funds on.
We have no means of supporting ourselves because thereâs no state pay. Because we have no state pay, we have no way to eat. As the brother said, even though it was just a little bit of money, but it still was something. You still could buy some hygiene [products].
When they do lockdown, theyâre supposed to give you showers Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays, whatever the lockdown be for. But they donât ever honor it. They want to do one cell at a time, and itâll take you a whole week before you get a shower. You have some prisons where the water system is messed up. Particularly at Lieber [Correctional Institute], their water system has been messed up forever. When you flush the toilet or pour your water, it smells like rotten eggs. They say it has sulfur in it or whatever, but it eats up the actual metal, and causes mold and stuff to be all over the prison.
If they were to go do a tour through that prison right now, and they go all the way from the lock-up to the yard, the ceiling is falling in, metal hanging down, itâs dripping all over the place, mold is all over the place, people who are in prison for 15-20 years are dying from cancer. But they donât have no cigarettes inside, you feel me?
Weâre confined to a cell a lot. They do a lot of counts and the counts always last for a long period of time. The purpose of counting is to make sure that weâre here. In all reality, they should just count us and then let us back out for recreation. If you count from the time you eat dinner on a Friday night to your next meal on a Saturday, itâs 17-18 hours before you get your next meal. And on the daily basis, youâre talking about 12 to 13 hours from when you get your first meal to your next meal, thatâs almost like a half a day, thatâs a long time.
So you eat up all your [food purchased from the] canteen, which forces you to go the canteen and spend a lot of money on a bunch of a junk that they price gouge, thatâs super high, but this money is coming from their family members who are out there working hard to help support you as well.
They have completely in my eyes mastered the art of dehumanizing prisoners.
D: One of the things that has not fully been addressed in South Carolina is the nature and culture of disrespect from the officers inside the South Carolina Department of Corrections, as well. They have completely in my eyes mastered the art of dehumanizing prisoners. Once again, we have to keep in mind they intentionally went into an overdrive of taking the prisoners clothes. Not only taking the prisoners clothes, cutting the prisoners hair the same way, had it to where you canât have your money in your pocket, just a number of things to take away your individuality. And in the process of taking away your individuality, they begin to treat you as if you were garbage. What I mean by treat you as garbage, just by dehumanizing us it makes it easier for them to abuse us, and this abuse a lot of times takes place as physical abuse.
We had in the Super Max Units out in Columbia, South Carolina maybe about a year or two ago, guards bumrush a prisoner inside his cell, stab him up. Weâve always had a number of incidents with regards to them cuffing prisoners, then cut prisoners up, slamming prisoners on their heads. In some cases weâve had some mysterious deaths, some hangings that prisoners are clearly not comfortable with labelling them as hangings on these maximum security prisons.
Weâve also had incidents where prisoners, when he speaks of recreation, understand something about this recreation a lot of places and a lot of areas right now, prisoners are no longer getting rec at all. Itâs like every blue moon before we even see any sunlight or daylight to be able to get rec. What we are finding is that, that itself is causing a lot of attitude problems. A lot of aggressiveness.
When we talk about the food, we donât get any fruit, no real fruit anyway. At one time they actually had salad bars; they removed all of that over two decades ago. Now you get nothing. Some of the food is labeled ânot for human consumption.â So these are normal things that we are actually dealing with inside the prison system.
For visitation, thereâs no contact with your visitor, with your loved ones. One kiss in, one kiss out. Rather than a hug, sit down, embrace each other. Be in the comfort of each otherâs company. Weâre finding that is moving further and further away, and Iâm very fearful that weâre moving to the stage of video visits very soon, in the very near future.
Jared: Talk a little bit about the angle of this around technology. Bryan Stirling has been for at least a year now, probably more, heâs been on this kick about getting cell phones out. You know there was this sort of fairly high profile escape less than a year ago, and they blamed cell phones for that. And theyâre also blaming this riot on cell phones. Theyâre talking about phone jammers. So just talk a little bit about cell phones in relation to the prisons and what they mean or provide to prisoners and how realistic some of these narratives or fears that are being stated by SCDC are.
S: SCDCâs main reason for not wanting the phones inside the prison system is because the phones got camera access, video access, and the phones can expose the things that they do. When theyâre using extreme force – the same way people are using cell phones out on the street when theyâre catching certain things that cops arenât supposed to be doing and stuff like that – see they can be exposed, they canât hide when weâve got the phones.
The prisoners utilize the phones to communicate with their family members. The phone system that [SCDC has], the phone prices are entirely too high, nobody would use that. They get money off it, too, and everybody knows that. And prisoners use the phone as a means of staying connected to their families, fathers staying connected to their children. Some fathers back here are raising their children from prison by staying in contact with them.
So SCDC just wants the phones out of the prisons because they donât want to be exposed. They donât want the videos of the fights and stabbings to be shown. Thereâs other things prisoners are shooting videos of. Theyâre showing videos of the brown water, they show videos of the mold inside the buildings. They show videos of the prisoners whoâve been dead in the bed for two hours and the guard ainât come and check on the man yet. So itâs a fly on the wall for them, thatâs why they donât want them in here.
Jared: Iâve heard some reporting on how high the death numbers are from South Carolina over the past couple years, but Iâve also heard from some prisoners that they believe the death numbers are actually much higher than whatâs being reported. For example, Iâve had a prisoner tell me that, even though SCDC is officially stating death toll numbers in the teens over the last year, and these numbers are very high based on national averages, that the numbers are actually higher but they believe SCDC is only reporting certain kinds of deaths.
S: Yeah they are only reporting certain kinds of deaths, not including some deaths that they have caused themselves. And just to give you an example, they have a cell in the area they call the RHU (Restrictive Housing Unit) thatâs supposed to be the area they put people that get in trouble or whatever. And theyâve got a cell thatâs called a CI (Crisis Intervention) cell. Thatâs where they strip you, make you get butt naked you got no clothes on, no nothing, and when they do bring you something, theyâll bring you a suicide blanket only.
So you had a guy years ago, where he said he was going to kill himself, so they put him in the CI, so the guy told one of the Lieutenants later on that night he was cool. The Lieutenant gave the man a sheet and then they say the man hanged himself. Thatâs what they said. But by policy and by rule, nobody is supposed to have [any] sheets in [any] CI cell and everybody know that, especially the Lieutenant, whoâs a supervisor. So thatâs their fault. He was a mentally ill patient. Thatâs on them. So of course you know when they write it up, or they give the information to the public or his family, they [arenât telling those] people that.
D: Absolutely. Iâd like to add to that as well. One of the reasons why the number is probably higher as well is theyâre dealing with medical neglect. So Iâll give you an example. I saw a guy that fell out of his seat. And the guard looked over the guy, but the prisoner was the only one that responded and started to give the guy mouth to mouth resuscitation. Well, come to find out the guy who was giving him resuscitation, his face started turning blue. Five minutes later the nurse arrives, and they lean over and they tell the guy and tell the officer theyâd been giving mouth-to-mouth the wrong way. I honestly sat there and saw them kill this man for that particular incident.
And weâve also seen incidents where guys fall out, no medical treatment whatsoever. I consider those direct murders, as well, of the state. When staff are failing to respond or respond and say, âOh, youâre faking it, youâre not having a heart attack,â and you fall out and die right there. We saw that happen several times as well. So this also would account for why some of the prisoners would say that these numbers definitely would be higher, after they are witnessing some people being allowed to die, the way that theyâre being allowed to die.
If I can, I wanted to kind of backtrack on the question you asked earlier on cell phones.
Jared: Sure.
D: First things first, I always have to understand the basic fundamental nature of todayâs prison system throughout this nation is slavery. We understand that itâs based on the 13th Amendment of the United States constitution, we canât get around that. Thereâs a profit business, so itâs all about profit, itâs about the profit margin. Thatâs what fuels the numbers in the prisons across this nation. Itâs no different in the state of South Carolina.
Technology, with prisoners having access to communication, the phone business has lost billions literally, in this state right here alone. Billions! They have put in certain rooms in here, theyâve put these machines in called kiosks, they are getting no play. This is where youâre supposed to be able to send out literally something like text messages to your people. They thought this was going to be a booming industry, nobody is using it. This is a loss of revenue.
We have these same phone companies that are investing in the department of corrections, literally for free, giving them equipment to find cell phones. Giving them equipment to search our families at the front gate when they come in to visit us, giving them equipment to monitor the gate areas. So theyâre giving them this. This wasnât just a free handout, but this was because [they] need to make money, [they] need to get these phones out of the system. That has always been understood.
Even now, Iâm hearing that, even with the jamming equipment that Bryan Stirling is requesting and supposed to have a hold of for Lee County right now, I think the company is called âTech something,â Iâm not really sure exactly, but my understanding is that the parent company is GTL.
Jared: I heard that rumor as well.
D: So, I have to do my research on that, [but] this is definitely what Iâm hearing. This is all about business, this is all about money. The minute they can wipe out, itâs like using one stone to kill two birds at the same time. You kill that communication gap, that gap where theyâve been reporting on, because most of the time, when they come out with a lot of frivolous things, itâs immediately refuted by us, by some pictures or some videos or something. Saying, âNo, this is what happened.â This is unusual. This is something thatâs very revolutionary, [a] very new generation in the prison system. They are not used to that; they had all communications with media locked down.
Keep in mind, SCDC has a policy where we are not allowed to converse with the media unless itâs authorized by the South Carolina Department of Corrections. And I have a big beef with that.
Jared: Absolutely. So letâs pivot a little bit because thereâs a lot of talk right now about violence. So thereâs a couple of questions I wanted to ask related to that. One is, what do you all see as the source of violence within prisons? And then the other one is about gangs and this idea – because I think that people donât really think about this very thoroughly – about why someone might join a gang in prison and why they might be even more likely to join one in prison versus when theyâre out on the outside?
E: I would have to say dealing with the gangs⌠Well, Iâm going to start first with what the brother asked about what stimulates the violence. Me personally, I feel that the violence is stimulated by the overt oppressive nature of the beast and what theyâre doing. Like yâall already had mentioned, theyâre constantly taking [things] away and keeping us confined to a box. And you take three or four different tribes, who normally may get along, or see eye-to-eye on a business level or whatever the terms may be, but you put them in a box and you donât separate them or give them anything to be⌠So you may know that this area may be predominantly this culture, or that area may be predominantly that culture, but Iâm going to take them all and mix them up, just so I can make it confusing. Because to me, it seems like they stir the violence up because thatâs the type of media they need to put their spin on things.
Then it goes back to the [cell phones], and we come and tell the truth on the fact and thatâs a problem for them, because theyâre going to say [the violence] is because of a cell phone, or itâs because of this and that. Theyâre not going to sit there and tell you itâs because [they] keep oppressing us, and taking away from us, and not giving us any outlets to do and be about positive things.
Nowadays, you got the tribes, or the âgangsâ as some may say, coming up with positive ideas to do and bring together and unify, despite what the police or the officers are doing. Theyâre steady trying to take away all our hope, but we still got brothers and organizations coming together, still trying to rectify unity on a level where we donât even have nothing to look forward to. So you can only imagine how discouraging it gets when itâs like weâre striving to do so much better and so much greater but weâre still getting a foot on our neck. Me personally, that can ignite [drama] any time, any place, on the street, in the penitentiary, wherever.
So I have to say, itâs incited by them, themselves. I feel like they feel like, if enough violence goes on, they can put their spin on it and they can basically – like my comrade said – bring lock-up to the yard. They keep us locked down for nothing. Every little thing, they blame it on [staff shortages]. They donât give us showers, they blame it on [staff shortages].
If an incident goes on, thereâs no officers there to protect anybody. Thatâs another thing about the gangs. Nowadays, you donât know, these young brothers might need protection. They canât look at the officers and say these officers are going to protect me and keep me safe. It ainât no such thing as that. You gotta fend for yourself back here. So I look at that, thatâs another reason why people are joining these gangs like that. Not everyone, but you can only imagine, youâve got kids coming back here 16, 17, have nobody. Youâre throwing them in here with [prisoners] in a maximum security prison with a 100 year [sentences]. Youâre going to have to have somebody or some type of way to get around. Or some people just lose hope and just fall by the wayside, and just do whatever theyâve got to do to get through, but you got some people that try. And to me, itâs like sometimes the gangs [are] a better outlet for them, because then they donât have to worry about people taking advantage of them.
Because like I said, itâs fend for yourself back here. It ainât like it used to be where you had enough officers and stuff. [Back then], something might pop off, it might go down, and it gets broken up and under control. Nah, now the officers are running the opposite way.
You might try to escape from being hurt, theyâll lock you on the wings and cause your death. Thatâs exactly why theyâre trying to take these phones, because weâre the ones who are putting that out there and letting people know this is what theyâre doing. This man live couldâve been saved, but the officers didnât do their job.
S: People arenât born criminals. They are criminalized by the environments they are socialized within. United States Constitutionâs 13th Amendment is proof alone that the mass amount of the warehousing of prisoners is not by accident. And even prisoners convicted of violent crime or who may be involved in violent activities, they may one day return to society still. Peopleâs cases can be overturned, some of these guys got max-out dates, some may make parole. So wouldnât it be wise for them to be implementing programs that would better the prisoners, not make them worse? They should want to heal anything that they consider to be sick or whatever.
Society itself promotes and produces violence. People ainât getting like that in prison, theyâre already like that out there. Television, movies, video games, comic books, novels, cartoons alone. They are indoctrinating this psychological behavior. Theyâre doing that out there in society.
Like the brother said, some of these guys that are locked-up in here are juveniles. Thatâs a learned behavior, they werenât born violent. And in regards to the survival thing, we create our own means of survival, because the state donât provide us with adequate supplies of anything. They give us one roll of tissue a week. One roll a week, thatâs it. Itâs 15-18 hours between meals in here sometimes. Thatâs just reality.
Only prison industries workers get paid for working. Everybody elseâs work is free labor. But weâre looking at these other prisoners going to work, knowing that theyâre getting a paycheck, they even file taxes. They can pay child support and provide for their families on it. All prisoners should get paid for all work, not just prison industries.
Theyâre making millions of dollars off federal prisoners and state prisoners across the country through prison industries. Thatâs facts.
D: Very true. Most prisoners, when they come to prison, come with the mindset that they want to get themselves together, and I think a lot of people miss that right there. Even the ones that are labeled violent–and when I hear people say âviolent,â we have to be careful with that term. Because a lot of times people are using this term âviolent,â and weâre seeing politicians saying âwell, weâre not going to be supporting violent offenders.â Itâs a new theme now, where we just promote policies [that benefit] non-violent offenders. And that kind of sickens me because, at the end of the day, who determines whatâs violent? Who determines whatâs a violent offender? To me, thatâs a bunch of people making up these laws, and they determine whatâs violent and what is not. And a lot of times people have non-violent offenses and these are straight up violent offenses in my eyes. You know, so Iâm very careful with that term non-violent versus violent offenders.
The people that they want to categorize and label as violent offenders for the most part, these brothers and the women that come into prison, they come in with the mindset that they want to do the right thing. I think the minute they enter through those gates, and the minute they begin to observe their surroundings, they begin to recognize immediately, that any change they wanted to do, they donât need to do it, because theyâre going to be perceived a certain way and theyâre going to be handled a certain way, you know, and itâs going to be a lose-lose situation for them. And people have to really understand that humans are entering through these gates and becoming prisoners, and in the process of that, the environment back here is making it worse. It is creating something in these prisoners that is a lot worse than when they came in for a lot of these guys and women.
Because, once again, they may have done some terrible things out there, but for the most part, when they start going through and they recognize the days ahead of them, they want to change, they want to do something different. Hell, I know I was about that when I came in here until I went through the reception and evaluation center, and saw it wasnât going to work out that way.
That is another reason why some people want to group up. Some people want family back here as well. I like to call them street formations [as opposed to using the term gang]. A lot of times, people need someone that can look out and care for their best interests, too. Not just in the protection role, but also somebody that gives a damn, because the system is so cold. So when youâre sitting back here, and youâre drinking, youâre smoking, youâre dabbing, youâre talking about your loved ones with your homeboy there, thatâs a different feeling versus when you can get outside that cell and youâre looking at the prison itself, and the environment itself, which is a cold place.
So everybody looks for some sense of comfort, some sense of love, which is another reason I think the prison system eliminating our contacts, our family ties, is really detrimental to prisoners re-entering society successfully, but thatâs another subject.
S: Let me do a quick rebuttal on what he said on the non-violent versus violent offenders, because I like what he said. Out there in society, when theyâre talking about what people are incarcerated for–like if somebody is convicted for murder–thatâs considered to be a violent offense. But that couldâve been a first time offense. And then he comes to prison, heâs been in prison for fifteen years, and he ainât never had another violent offense on his record, he ainât never had a violent offense in prison, heâs not involved in any violent activity [on the inside], so why is he still considered to be a violent person? Just because heâs got a violent charge on his record, that donât mean that heâs indulging in violent activities. Because sometimes, the people in prison that have non-violent charges, sometimes theyâre the ones involved in violent activities back here.
Jared: Lee Correctional Facility is named after the county, Lee County. And that county is named after Robert E. Lee. So you have a Confederate General and a former slave owner and you have a facility that is in his name, that really, as you all have mentioned, really carries on that same tradition into 2018. To what degree do you think this registers with prisoners? What does it mean to prisoners that make that connection?
D: And when did Lee open up, 1994?
Jared: Yeah in that era.3Â And just to give a little more context, the county was first named Lee County in the 1890âs after Reconstruction had ended.
S: My only response to that is that the prisoners, who were probably from the Bishopville area who may have had that information through the educational system, or conscious prisoners who read and research things â those prisoners might be aware of that, but for the vast majority of prisoners, that donât have any significance to them because most of them are not aware of that.
D: I would have to second that. I donât think prisoners for the most part have any awareness of that. Matter of fact, to be honest with you, as much reading as I have done, as much cultural reading as I have done, I was very ignorant of that up until very recently, up until the last several weeks. I just learned this information
As far as the effect, I can tell you for me, personally, it says something about progress and where we were at mentally. When this prison came about, I think between â92 and â94, for you to still name a prison after that during that time period… Although, donât get it wrong, we all know a prison is nothing more than a modern day plantation. So we understand that fact, so really itâs quite fitting. But still, it would seem you wouldnât want to name one of your state institutions after this right here. It seems like someone would raise their hand and say, âNo.â
I think that also tells me, as a black man, how conditioned a lot of black people are around in these southern areas as well. Because Iâm sure that they knew what the Lee County name stood for, what the name represented. The ones that voted in this particular institution in that area, the ones that were saying it would hold this name, they knew, and they didnât say anything.
This is the type of mindset weâre dealing with in the state of South Carolina today, which is why Iâm constantly reminding people we have the highest rate as it relates to racial disparities in the nation. We are in the top six or seven states as far as racial disparities as it relates to sentencing and imprisonment rates in the nation. I think weâre only like 20-30 percent of the population in South Carolina 4 and over 60-something percent of the prison population 5
They did a recent study not too long ago that told us that black people specifically were being automatically over-sentenced by judges. It said if you were black, you were 50 times more likely to get jail time for a minor offense versus if you were any other race. If you were compared to white defendants, you were over 70 percent more likely to be sentenced to longer sentences, based on your race. 6 Everybody knows the color of the state of South Carolina when you walk into the prison system. Â I think all of this is an indicator of the nature of the beast that we are dealing with.
And I have to note that, even when South Carolina was going through their Reconstruction phase, all of these same blacks that were a part of the Reconstruction phase were eventually thrown out of power, and thatâs because there was a compromise between the North and the South. And we have to always remember that right there. Thatâs when we get back to 1865, thatâs when we get back to the 13th Amendment, that constitutional amendment and the compromise that was reached across the table. The power dynamics in the South has never changed. And I think weâre seeing the rottenness of it in todayâs times. Thatâs why I think weâre seeing these extreme responses, these extreme reactions in the prison systems throughout these southern states.
S: Every time prisoners do strive to organize, to come together to make things better for themselves, the administration really doesnât give you much support or they attack you. For example, one of my comrades, he recently had been released from prison over the last year or so. He was housed at Lee County at one point and he was a coordinator on the compound.
He was able to organize over 150 members every week to come together positively, sit down and have discussions, and things of that nature. Whenever there would be any type of altercations or whatever, they would try to talk over things first and most often if they couldnât, then they would handle it like men and knuckle it up. But there wasnât so much knives, and people getting killed or stabbed up. All of that was calmed down for a while. So you had the STG (Security Threat Group) supervisor from headquarters and he got with the warden at that time, and they called him to a conference and they wanted him to explain to them how is it that you could have Crips, Bloods, Muslims, etc., in the same room every week and thereâs never any violence going on? The [STG] told [the warden] that [the prisoners] were up to something, thatâs how they felt. And what did they do to [the prisoner coordinating the program]? They shipped him to another institution.
When they moved him to another institution, they started to do things on the Lee County yard from a program perspective. To make a long story short, [the coordinator] was eventually sent home. While he went home, now you had other things popping off at other yards, who didnât have these types of positive things going on. They moved these guys around, piled all these guys up on one yard, all on one side, waited for one thing to happen. Boom! You get the worst thing that happened in the last 25 years. That was strategically implemented.
D: Yeah. Absolutely. And I think thatâs very important to note that, back to Lee County very briefly, that all of this right here is not by accident. None of it is by accident. Thatâs the sad part about it.
S: Yeah, they were used as lab rats. One more thing with regards to laws and stuff like that: a lot of times in South Carolina, people get convicted unjustly. And whenever somebody discovers that–and itâs something that affects a lot of prisoners–and they put it into the courthouse and they pass a law or something on it, and they know theyâve done a lot of wrong to a lot of people, but what theyâll do is theyâll slide a word in it so that [it doesnât take effect] retroactively. Because if they had to [implement it] retroactively, theyâd have to let a lot of people go, because they convicted a lot of people unjustly. Theyâve been doing that for the longest.
Jared: So I want to give you all an opportunity to talk about change. What changes would you like to see in the prison system? What changes do you think could improve the situation? And then the second part of that is, what would you like to see people on the outside do to support? But letâs start with the first part.
D: So what changes would we like to see in the prison system?
Jared: Yeah. I know some of you are abolitionists, but what can be done for immediate needs in terms of reforms.
D: Yeah, Iâm always thinking about it as a dismantling process. Iâve been trying to push that for a while. We call it a dismantling process. And that gives the opportunity for other people to get in with their reform ideas, because I donât think we can go from one angle all the way to the other angle, like from zero to a hundred, itâs just not going to happen like that. It is not going to play out like that.
Nonetheless, some of the things that I feel can actually improve. Improvement. First and foremost, sentencing. Sentencing reform in the state of South Carolina. Itâs not just sentencing reform in the state of South Carolina, itâs actually sentencing reform across the nation. They need to get rid of that Truth-In-Sentencing deal, period.
We need an end of dehumanizing conditions, and that means food improvement. We need open yards again, not just enclosed rec yards, we need these open rec yards again, where prisoners can move. We need prisoners to start being treated like humans. We need more rights to our visits. We need education programs, Iâm a big one on education programs, in particular Pell Grants, thereâs some other names, they need to be brought back to the prison systems again.
Not only that, but what the state of South Carolina did as the prison population fell they–instead of closing down the maximum security prisons, they closed down their work releases. We need work releases re-opened back up and expanded. Then we need one last thing: we need pay. We need prisoners to be able to be paid for their labor. If youâre doing general labor, you need to be able to be paid for that labor, just the way it comes in at ending prison slavery. We need to end prison slavery, which I think is a trigger toward abolitionist work. But nonetheless, we need to end prison slavery to bring back a lot of these prisoners getting paid their wages. So I think those are immediate things that can be improved on. Was there another question beyond that?
Jared: The second question was, what can people on the outside do that actually care about the situation, care about the conditions of prisoners, care about whatâs going on in South Carolina?
D: On the outside right now, one of the biggest things weâre moving into in particular in Jailhouse Lawyers Speak, we need to move into becoming more involved in the electoral process, in particular local politics. We need to become more involved in that. Weâre hoping that our loved ones outside that support us, we need to organize more ground support as it relates to prisons. We need to see more protests, we need to see more meetings with these directors, we need to see more organizing at state capitols. We need to see more support of what has already been initiated on the ground in the state of South Carolina.
We need to figure out how to get our local county jails and get people who are detained there registered to vote, and get the voting machines into these county jails, and get these prisoners the ability that they can have the vote. The problem with state of South Carolina is itâs a good-old-boy system, and we need to change the face of it. And the only way weâre going to be able to change it is we have to get more involved in the electoral process, but not just voting for a Democrat or Republican or Independent or whatever, but voting for people that have prisonerâs best interests. Every group of people have interests and we have to find people that have our interests at heart.
E: I really agree with what D said, thatâs all I was really going to say, really, about sentencing reform, more programs, even the better nutrition, and rec, let us get some physical exercise and more education.
S: I think we also need an outside grievance system. Because the grievance system is definitely not fair or impartial back here. The same people that work for the prison are the same people who are deciding if we should get results or not from our grievances. Everything else I think the brother already covered. But I also want to say for society, to them let he who has not sinned cast the first stone. Prisoners, some of us in here, have made mistakes and some of us did the things we did, but we made mistakes. But we have paid for our mistakes. Show some humanity. Thatâs what we want society to do is show some humanity.
D: One last note that I wanted to add, the ground is vibrating right now for a national strike August 21st throughout the nation. We have a number of states that are already vowing to participate in this national strike, particularly in support of the state of South Carolina and the recent issues that just happened. They say South Carolina is an example of whatâs actually occurring throughout the nation. It just so happened that these particular people died here [at Lee Correctional] so they want to get in the back of this right here and they want to highlight it by mobilizing throughout the inside.
So we can ask those folks to support it on the outside, we need to support it on the outside to really support these actions. Let the people know that wherever prisoners may decide to have a strike or a sit in that the public is mindful and they are watching for any type of retaliatory actions that may take place throughout the process of this resistance that may be taking place across this nation, on August 21st.
Jared: Great, absolutely, is there anything else anyone wants to add about Lee or any of the other points where we might have missed something?
E: I would just like to add that in the aftermath of the incident that happened over at Lee, and all over the state, weâre being massively punished. No showers, power is being cut off all this time, weâve been locked down for a week, almost going on two weeks, and weâve only had one shower and that was like, they cut the hot water off. What type of inhumane thing is that?
Jared: Are there other conditions you want people to know about since the incident at Lee that havenât been addressed?
S: One of the things is they have the metal plates on the window where you canât see outside, you canât see the sunlight, you canât see the grass or the daylight. They got it sealed out where you canât get no oxygen through it, the ventilation is all messed up, these are things that they just recently did. Theyâre putting flaps on the doors so you can just slide the meal through it. They are animalizing the prisoners.
About The Writer:
Jared Ware is a freelance writer and advocate for the rights of incarcerated peoples.
Contact/Social Media Information:
Twitter: @jaybeaware  @Beyond Prisons
Beyond Prisons Patreon:Â http://www.patreon.com/beyondprisons
Email:Â jaybeware@gmail.com
Weâre excited to offer the fourth in Eric Burnhamâs five-part series on “The Four Agreements,” by bestselling author Don Miguel Ruiz. In the book, Ruiz reveals the source of self-limiting beliefs that rob us of joy and create needless suffering. Based on ancient Toltec wisdom, The Four Agreements offer a powerful code of conduct that can rapidly transform our lives to a new experience of freedom, true happiness, and love.
Assumptions are toxic and corrosive. They erode personality and mental stability, causing people to approach social interactions in a schizophrenic way. A real I-want-but-I-don’t philosophy takes hold. An assumption is something presupposed, something taken as a given based on emotional reasoning rather than logic.Â
Assumptions prove to be false more often than not. They are erroneous for two primary reasons: First, they are formed with very little information and few actual facts. Second, since they are driven by emotions and insecurities, they almost always flow from the worst possible scenarios.Â
Self-confidence and self-efficacy, which is one’s belief in his or her ability to accomplish a given task or perform under pressure, are immediately disrupted by assumptions. Once you assume what others are thinking, feeling, or doing, you’re no longer on firm footing, and you’re no longer in control of yourself. You limit your options. You react to something you don’t know to be true, putting yourself at a significant disadvantage emotionally.Â
Have you ever thought someone was bad-mouthing you or laughing at you behind your back? You then react to that assumption, avoiding or challenging that person, even though your suspicions haven’t been confirmed, only to later find out you were incorrect in your assumption. You come off looking like a fool, and others begin to doubt your mental stability.Â
When you make assumptions and react to them, you’re not as confident or decisive as you could be because you’re operating from the emotional part of your mind, which was never intended to drive the train because it does not take factual information into account. It bases decisions on a reality of its own making, rather than objective reality. Repeated occurrences of reacting to your assumptions and later finding out that you were wrong is damaging to the spirit, opening the door for self-doubt to take root in your personality. If not dealt with properly, self-doubt leads to masking and over-compensation.Â
Masking is essentially hiding from reality, putting on a front and keeping the world away from the real you. But the other side of that coin is that you keep the real you from the world, never allowing your unique light to shine. Eventually, you’ll begin to over-compensate for every perceived weakness in a thinly-veiled attempt to show the world you’ve got it all together, that you’ve got it all figured out. But you don’t. None of us do. We are all navigating life on earth with limited information. We function best when we have as much information as we can get before we make decisions.Â
Don’t make assumptions about others or what you think others think of you. You simply don’t know, and rushing to judgment does not provide the safety it promises. Gather more information before reacting in your thoughts, emotions, and behaviors. You’ll feel better, and you’ll be far less anxious. Your life goes on either way, but you have the choice to make assumptions or not. Therefore, you have the choice to pursue well-being… or not.
It’s not too often that we take time in our day to reflect on the many good things we have: a job, healthy kids, a home in a safe neighborhood, food on the table, and the list could obviously go on for pages. After all, we are so preoccupied with the hustle and bustle of day-to-day affairs, doing everything we can to stay on top of our responsibilities; who has time to stop what they’re doing, ponder life’s blessings, and truly be grateful for them without thinking about what we need to get done the next day â or even an hour from now? But doing this is actually as critical as taking care of all the obligations we give so much of our attention to.
I have indeed found myself contemplating, more and more, the many blessings I have, even in my current circumstance which is inherently negative. But this is not entirely voluntary; allow me to explain.
I work for an addictions treatment program. Every day we start the group session with a daily reflection read from a book, and each person says why or how it resonates with him, followed by what is called a Daily Moral Inventory (DMI). When we check in for the DMI, each person says how the previous day went, what they’re grateful for, what they regret (if anything), etc. This expectation can at times seems repetitive, but I’ve learned that it’s a healthy practice to get into because if I were not “required” to do it, I likely wouldn’t “have time” to reflect on what I’m grateful for, in spite of my physical circumstance. Instead, I’d either keep my head down and stay focused on my job, my next goal, or find myself complaining about what is not going well in my life.Â
It’s entirely too easy to fall into a pattern of allowing good fortune in our lives to go unacknowledged as we focus our attention on the next goal or responsibility we want and/or need to carry out. This is a harmful practice, however, because it is essential to our psychological well-being that we take time to “pat ourselves on the back” for things we’ve accomplished, appreciate the things and people that make our lives more purposeful and fulfilling, and be grateful for opportunities that others have not had in life. Doing this has allowed me to refocus my efforts, while doing my part to “pay it forward” in others’ lives when I’m given the opportunity to do so.
I intend to keep this practice of daily reflection and gratitude going even after I release from prison because it’s shown me how to ground myself on a daily basis. Life is entirely too short not to celebrate our good fortune and acknowledge how others have enriched our lives.
I take time to acknowledge and be appreciative that I can fulfill my dream of becoming a drug and alcohol counselor. I get to work for a successful treatment program in a prison setting, and teach groups and individuals about addiction and recovery, decreasing their likelihood to recidivate after they are released. I have had the rare opportunity to earn a Master’s degree in prison that, according to statistics, gives me a 0% chance to recidivate. Moreover, it enables me to go directly into my field with a level of credibility and respect that I never imagined coming into prison 14 years ago.
These are a few of the many things I take time to appreciate as often as I can. Life has enough struggles to complain about; therefore, I owe it to myself (as do you) to cast as much sunshine on my day as possible â by counting my blessings.
I was caught in the web of the tainted justice system and my freedom depends on this…. Please read this and you will understand why I need your help.
I was charged with possession of a firearm by a prohibited person due to a conviction from over 15 years ago. Here’s where it gets tricky. Texas state law says I can own a firearm after 10 years but that conflicts with federal law. Federal law says I may never own a firearm again. I did not know this at the time. Now here I am facing a 10 year prison sentence for a law I had no idea I was breaking.
I paid my debt to society when I was 18 years old. But now 15 years later the government feels I should pay that debt again because their law conflicts with my states laws. To me, that is something the lawmakers need to work out and fix. Why are the citizens always the ones to suffer? In this case it’s not just me who suffers, it’s my children as well. They need their dad, but do you think the government cares about that? NOPE! This is a loophole in the justice system and it’s about to cost me my freedom if I do not hire a good attorney.
This is the same thing the government is doing to the marijuana companies. The state allows them to sell the marijuana but the Feds then kick in the doors of the stores and arrest them and make them pay for their freedom back. Only difference is…. I’m not a company and cannot afford to hire an attorney. I am a father of two and have a family to support and I need your help.
I’ve never done this before but it’s my last resort. If you can’t donate please share my story with anyone you can. And if you would like to contact me personally my email is lawrencearcher83@yahoo.com. this is not a scam…it’s my life and very real. Thanks in advance to anyone who decides to help. Anything is a blessing. Even if it’s a dollar. God bless you all.
Everything we do revolves around the mail, and opening our post office box is a daily adventure. This week, we received a handful of unexpected donations in the mail – just in time for our volunteer work sessions this weekend.
Thank you from the bottom of our hearts to angels Laurie and Nicole, who donated items in December and January; and to Wendy, Laura, and an anonymous donor who sent items this week. Because of your gifts, hundreds of inmates will hear their name at mail call in the coming weeks.
Â
On this day, which is almost nine years in the making, I wish to dedicate this AI blog post to Michael Henderson. Michael’s hearing is today (finally!) and I am in attendance (we are finally in the same room!).
I have known Michael for going on three years. The past two he has spent in the Pinellas County Jail, most of that time waiting on his Public Defender to show up. Very rarely did he put in an appearance, nor did he accomplish one single thing in 20 months to progress Michael’s case. With thanks to a benefactor, his paid attorneys have taken the bull by the horns and the hearing is finally taking place today, Friday, March 16.
In the time Michael and I have known each other, we have exchanged countless letters and emails (not to mention spent a small fortune on phone calls – you’re welcome GTL!). Though I am quite biased, Michael’s words are pure treasure. In honor of his big day, the purpose of this post is to share some of his words with you:
Please take a moment to send a blessing to whatever power you believe rules the universe for our incarcerated loved ones everywhere. And remember – do all things with Love.
Leah a.k.a. Dove
The following promotion is directly from Jpay:
Sunday was Daylight Saving Time, so even though you set your clocks forward, we are rolling back prices! JPay is offering 10% off stamp purchases today through Friday, March 16, 2018!
We hope this promotion makes it a little bit easier to stay connected with your loved ones. You may purchase the promotional stamp packages on JPay.com, the JPay mobile app or by calling our toll-free number, 1-800-574-5729. This promotion is only valid for friends and family, not incarcerated individuals.
PLEASE NOTE: The 10% off discount is already reflected in the price shown on JPay.com and the JPay mobile app. The current purchase price reflects the discount, which means the discount wonât be imposed during checkout, rather the promotional price is currently displayed.
Participating locations: California (only California Institution for Women, California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility, Central California Womenâs Facility, High Desert State Prison, Kern Valley State Prison, Marin County Jail, TAFT Correctional Institution), Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, Minnesota, New Jersey, North Dakota, Ohio, Tennessee (only West Tennessee State Prison), Texas, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin (only Milwaukee House of Corrections).
Promotion valid from Monday, March 12th, 2018 at 9:00 AM EST until Friday, March 16th, 2017 at 9:00 PM EST.
Note: Combine this discount with our trick (email us or comment on this post for details) to get 60 stamps for $9.00Â during this promotion.
What a name, right? When I intially read this title I thought to myself, “There’s no way there’s any truth to this statement!” Then I began to read and was quickly proven wrong.
If you’re familar with comedian, brash in-your-face radio personality Charlamagne, you already know he speaks authentically about what’s on his mind, telling his audience not what they want to hear but what he believes to be true â period! In this book he stays true to his personality and this principle.
This is easily one of the most honest memoirs I’ve ever read. Charlamagne is not afraid to reveal his many insecurities, criticisms from the media and other prominent people he’s faced, and the most difficult and darkest times he encountered on his way to stardom and national fame. Black Privilege is not what you might think it means: it is not asserting that black people have an inherent privilage in society that is not available for non-black people. Instead, he espouses the notion that regardless of who you are â black, gay, disabled, etc. â you must first own who you are and, in spite of it, become a “privileged” person by pressing forward to evolve into the best version of yourself you can be. He illustrates the importance of not allowing whatever your insecurities or shortcomings are to inhibit your potential and success is. He conveys this strong message through his own story of triumph.
Charlamagne delivers his usual comedy that is so unfiltered and politically incorrect that you’re almost afraid to laugh out loud. He reveals the names of his rivals and provides insights into some of his most infamous moments and feuds with celebrities in the music industry; he simply doesn’t care. He tells his audience how he feels about those confrontations and why he’s grateful for having faced them throughout his career. Although he uses this platform to air his frustrations with people he’s encountered along the way, he’s not merely gossiping to sell books â there’s an underlying principle, life lesson in them.
The entire time I read this book, I felt as though he was not the celebrity that has become a household name, but rather a guy I could have easily known and hung out with in my neighborhood growing up. He speaks honestly and candidly about the hardships he encountered growing up, encouraging his readers to not allow their difficult circumstances to suppress their self-confidence and ultimately the pursuit of their goals.
What is especially easy to relate to and grab ahold of in Charlamagne’s story are the nuggets of wisdom that he offers in the form of colorful language. Again, staying true to his comedic roots, he touts principles to live by with semi-humorous yet keenly astute phrases that he has relied on to overcome his circumstances and attain impressive success. If you’re one of those who appreciates quotes to live by, you certainly will not be disappointed with this book.
Black Privilege is inspirational, refreshingly honest, very easy and entertaining to read, and well written. It speaks to the kid who grew up in rural South Carolina and the kid who hailed from the metropolis of New York City. I found myself laughing out loud at times, while, surprisingly, feeling very sympathetic at other times. This book resonated with me because it could have been my story or anyone else’s I know. I firmly believe you will come away feeling the same after you’ve read it.
Please enjoy this speech delivered by our friend and featured writer Martin Lockett about Martin Luther King Jr.